One may plainly say that Apple’s new iPad is an assistive technology device. Like the iPhone, it includes many accessibility features such as:
- VoiceOver
- screen zoom
- white-on-black display
- mono audio
- closed-captioned content
But as pointed out in the article Accessibility and the iPad: First Impressions, it additionally has the following helpful features:
- Large size (for visually impairments)
- External Keyboard (for mobile impairments)
- Speakers (for visually impairments)
- Simple Interface (for cognitive impairments)
Although I feel that the iPad is certainly better than Amazons’ Kindle, I believe that the iPad will not “kill” the Kindle, mostly because of the price difference. The iPad is much more expensive ranging from $499 to $699 while the Kindle is $259. For more on this, check out Apple Tablet Could Be A Kindle Killer.
More Related Articles
- Flash, iPad, Standards from Zeldman
- The Apple iPad and accessibility ‘out of the box’ from BBC
- iPad: Overhyped Flop or a case of Great Design Thinking?
This post is sponsored by: Hosted Exchange
One reply on “iPad Is Assisitive Technology But No Killer”
Hi,
I also noticed that Apple didn’t bother to caption the iPad keynote address (video) from Jobs, nor did it caption the iPad demo video. It did not add iPad to its accessibility page either. I wrote about this on my abledbody.com blog: http://abledbody.com/profoundlyyours/2010/01/28/hey-apple-what-about-ipads-accessibility/