Categories
management

Your MVP Must Be Accessible

Your Minimum Viable Product (MVP) Must Be Accessible.

Full stop.

Related:

White bold letters M-V-P over a blue diamond over a dark blue background.

Categories
html5 screenreader testing

Strikethrough Accessibility

Strikethrough <s> is an HTML element to indicate text that is crossed out – usually indicated visually with a line through the middle of the text. The W3C definition is:

The s element represents contents that are no longer accurate or no longer relevant.

On e-commerce websites, a strikethrough element is often used to indicate a price is no longer valid and often has a reduced price next to it.

Screenshot of two similar examples of a product with an active and crossed out price. A red arrow points to each of the crossed out prices.

The problem is that most screen readers don’t output the strikethrough semantics. This can be very problematic to the blind user since they won’t know which price is valid. Most in-line semantic elements such as <em> and <mark> are not conveyed to screen readers actually. For more on that, reference the article Screen Readers support for text level HTML semantics by TPGi.

Let’s examine four test cases and the level of support. Note that the strikethrough element is mapped to the deletion ARIA role which we’ll use in test Scenario 2.

Test Cases

Four code scenarios were tested against 6 screen reader/browser/OS combinations including VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS, and TalkBack. The actual test cases used are in the second portion of the CodePen Negative number and strikethru tests.

Scenario 1: strikethrough element only

Price: $200 $100

Price: <s>$200</s> $100

The plain old semantic HTML—an S element around the text. This is obviously the ideal code, but support isn’t quite there yet. Only NVDA and TalkBack passed.

Scenario 2: strikethrough with ARIA ‘deletion’ role

Price: $200 $100

Price: <s role="deletion">$200</s> $100

This is similar to Scenario 1, but with the addition of role=”deletion”. The test results were similar to without the role. The only difference is that VoiceOver on iOS also passed.

Scenario 3: strikethrough with visually hidden text

Price: original price$200 sale price$100

Price: <span class="visually-hidden">original price</span><s>$200</s> <span class="visually-hidden">sale price</span>$100

This test case uses the old school technique of visually hiding text via CSS. “Original price” outputs before the price with the strikethrough, and “Sale price” outputs before the valid price.

All screen readers passed this scenario.

Scenario 4: strikethrough with visually hidden pseudo-content

Price: $200 $100

Price: <s>$200</s> $100

#pseudo s::before {
  content: " [start of stricken text] ";
}

#pseudo s::after {
  content: " [end stricken text] ";
}

#pseudo s::before,
#pseudo s::after {
  clip-path: inset(100%);
  clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);
  height: 1px;
  width: 1px;
  overflow: hidden;
  position: absolute;
  white-space: nowrap;
}

The fourth test case has the same HTML has Scenario 1. But then applies a brilliant method by Adrian Roselli introduced in 2017 in the article Tweaking Text Level Styles. Pseudo-content (creating a textual phrase via CSS) is used to indicate when the strikethrough starts and ends.

There are a couple issues to mention with this approach:

  1. Since NVDA now supports the strikethrough tag, it indicates the semantics twice — both the S element semantics (“deleted”) and the pseudo-content (“start of stricken text”) which creates ambiguity for the user.
    1. Oddly, the double semantics is not conveyed by TalkBack which did pass the previous three scenarios.
  2. With JAWS, the output is broken up with multiple stops which makes it difficult to follow. (Changing the brackets to parentheses might help.)

This technique technically works for all screen readers, but the user experience is very confusing for NVDA users.

Test Results

Does screen reader output “deleted”, “stricken”, or similar?

Test Results
iOS + Safari + VO MacOS + Safari + VO Android + Chrome + TalkBack Win + Chrome + NVDA Win + Firefox + NVDA Win + Chrome + JAWS
Scenario 1 No No Yes Yes Yes No
Scenario 2 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No
Scenario 3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Scenario 4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Conclusion

NVDA has the best support for <s>, the strikethrough element. For now, to best support screen readers overall, we should continue to use Scenario 3 — strikethrough with visually hidden text — to programmatically convey strikethrough semantics. Doing so will ensure that everyone understands strikethrough semantics while browsing the web which often means knowing the correct price of a product or service.

Further reading

Categories
w3c wcag wcag22

WCAG 2.2 Is Now A W3C Recommendation

Announcing: WCAG 2.2 is now published as a web standard—a W3C Recommendation!

For an introduction to WCAG, see the WCAG 2 Overview. There are also a few updates in the WCAG 2 FAQ.

1 Success Criterion dropped in WCAG 2.2

Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing has been removed. More info on this highly debated decision from W3C WAI on why 4.1.1 was removed. Also, see the article The 411 on 4.1.1 by Adrian Roselli.

9 new Success Criteria in WCAG 2.2

  • 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) (AA)
  • 2.4.12 Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) (AAA)
  • 2.4.13 Focus Appearance (AAA)
  • 2.5.7 Dragging Movements (AA)
  • 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) (AA)
  • 3.2.6 Consistent Help (A)
  • 3.3.7 Redundant Entry (A)
  • 3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum) (AA)
  • 3.3.9 Accessible Authentication (Enhanced) (AAA)

Related Articles

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2; W3C Recommendation 05 October 2023

Categories
jobs

Digital Accessibility Jobs, Sep 2023

Here’s a list of some recent job openings in digital accessibility — some great opportunities!

Categories
reporting roundup

Resources for Procurement of Accessible Digital Products and VPAT

Do you need to provide or to purchase an accessible website or other digital product but don’t know how to go about it? You’ll likely need to create or analyze an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) which is created from a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT). You can download the VPAT templates on the Information Technology Industry Council (ITIC) website.

There are four different versions of the VPAT:

  • VPAT Rev 508: Revised Section 508 standards – the U.S. Federal accessibility standard
  • VPAT Rev EU: EN 301 549 – the European Union’s “Accessibility requirements suitable for public procurement of ICT products and services in Europe”
  • VPAT Rev WCAG: WCAG 2.1 or ISO/IEC 40500 (equivalent to WCAG 2.0) and WCAG2.1, W3C/WAI’s recently updated Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
  • VPAT INT: International; incorporates all three of the above standards

Here are some great resources on how to leverage VPATs and ACRs:

ITI logo
VPATs are provided by ITI, the Information Technology Industry Council